|
|
|
|
|
19 Appendices | Back | Table of Contents | Next | Appendix B - Terminology Terminology relating to Developmental Co-ordination Disorder (DCD) including Dyspraxia The diagnostic criteria for health conditions are internationally standardised and catalogued by both the World Health Organisation (ICD10) and the America Psychiatric Association (DSMIV). The following definition is taken from the diagnostic criteria for Developmental Co-ordination Disorder (DCD) as outlined in DSM IV.
To be given a diagnosis a child with DCD must fulfil the criteria of A, B, C and where appropriate D. The diagnostic criteria as per ICD10 are also often quoted in literature. The condition in this classification is referred to as “specific developmental disorder of motor function”. It is described as “a disorder in which the main feature is a serious impairment in the development of motor co-ordination that is not solely explicable in terms of general intellectual retardation or of any specific congenital or acquired neurological disorder”. Nevertheless, in most cases a careful clinical examination shows marked developmental immaturities such as choreiform (jerky involuntary) movements of unsupported limbs or mirror movements and other associated motor features, as well as impaired fine and gross motor co-ordination. Terms used Include: Clumsy Child Syndrome, Developmental Co-ordination Disorder, and Dyspraxia Exclude: Abnormalities of gait and mobility (R26-) Lack of co-ordination (R27-) Secondary to mental retardation (F70-F79) DCD has had many labels and different names. Over the years they have included Motor Learning Difficulties, Minimal Brain Dysfunction, Sensory Integrative Dysfunction, Specific Learning Difficulties, spatial problems or Developmental Dyspraxia. The name given to the condition often reflects the ‘model’ or ‘theory’ the practitioner is using. At present, Developmental Co-ordination Disorder (as described in DSM-IV) is becoming the favoured term among clinicians and researchers. Dyspraxia is a more specific name to describe a particular aspect of DCD, i.e. particular difficulty with movement planning. All children with DCD do not have “Dyspraxia” in its true sense. However, in the UK many people use the term “Dyspraxia” in a more general way, which should be recognised when reading literature and when producing written work.
The Child There are many characteristic features which are commonly found in children with DCD. It is unlikely that any one child will display all of these features but many display a cluster. It should not be assumed, however, that a child who shows only one or two features necessarily has Developmental Co-ordination Disorder. In fact, many of these features may be seen within the normal population of children who have no apparent or marked difficulties. The following are some of those features which may alert us to the likelihood of DCD and which you may recognise in your child or pupil:
Co-Morbidity There may be other associated conditions, e.g. Attention Deficit (Hyperactivity) Disorder (ADHD), Dyslexia, Social/Communication problems.
It should also be remembered that there are many children with behavioural and emotional problems that are in no way related to DCD. Variability This is a very important factor in both the child’s performance and his emotional ability to cope. There may be some days, or phases, where he can do things better than at other times. It is easy to think ‘he could do it yesterday, so he must be able to do it today’. This is not necessarily the case. These children seem to have ‘good days’ and ‘bad days’; it is as though their Central Nervous Systems can ‘get things together’ better at some times than at others. These are some of the features, frequently seen in children with DCD. Where several of them exist, the child may be experiencing very real difficulties but, as already stated, they should never be taken in isolation as necessarily indicating motor problems or Specific Learning Difficulties.
What is the Problem? It is thought that the problem of Developmental Co-ordination Disorder may be caused by failure of the Central Nervous System adequately to interpret, integrate and process the information required to produce an appropriate response. This may be a motor response, such as reacting to save ourselves from falling, or a conceptual one such as recognising a complete object from the sensory information received. In order to understand this, we need to consider, very simply, how the normal Central Nervous System (CNS) works. It takes in, interprets, sorts out and connects sensory information, organises it and processes the response. All this goes on automatically, below the level of awareness. ‘Sensory Information’ needs further explanation. There are the more obvious senses, which we all know about, such as hearing, vision, taste and smell. However, every bit as important is the input which we rarely think about Tactile, Proprioceptive and Vestibular information. To explain more fully: Tactile refers to touch. There are two basic parts to our tactile systems: one responds to light or unexpected touch and protects us from potential danger. The other is discriminatory and helps us to gain information about the quality of what we feel hard or soft, rough or smooth, etc. Proprioceptive. Our proprioceptors give us information from muscles, ligaments, tendons and joints and therefore let us know the position of our body parts and our position in space, without our needing to look. They also help with the detection of force resulting in the ability to achieve force control. Vestibular refers to our balance system. This lets us know our relationship to gravity and our body position in space, e.g. whether the body or environment is moving, how fast we are moving, which way up we are, etc. Our Vestibular Systems along with Proprioceptive System are responsible for maintenance of posture. All these senses must receive information accurately and then the CNS must interpret and integrate it in order for us to function normally. For example, not only do we need adequate vision but also our systems need to interpret what we see and then integrate it with information from our other senses. This applies to all types of sensation.
Therefore, if a child has difficulty with several, or occasionally all, of these processes, he/she will have considerable difficulty with writing. The same applies to any other process from fairly basic motor tasks such as jumping, hopping, etc through to more complicated tasks such as riding a bicycle or tying shoelaces, to the most sophisticated areas of academic learning. A simple way to look at it is to imagine the brain as being a bit like a telephone exchange where, in the child with DCD, the wiring is incomplete, inefficient or crossed. The result, to use a another metaphor, has been described as being ‘something like a rush-hour traffic jam’. Sometimes interpretation and integration seem inadequate; sometimes different types of sensory input seem to be ‘at odds’ with one another. An example of the adverse way in which normal people react to conflicting stimuli is travel or seasickness, where if we watch the horizon we feel better than we do if we look at something that is stationary, e.g. a map in the car. In the former instance our vestibular and visual systems are giving us the same information: we are moving. In the latter, they are ‘at odds’ – our vestibular systems will give us signals that we are moving, but our vision is interpreting something static. Similarly, in a treatment session, a child with visual perceptual problems closed his eyes and produced much better ‘patterns’ on a board; he was relying on his very adequate tactile and proprioceptive systems and eliminating the conflicting information from his poor visual perception. In order to move on from movement to learning, there are further requirements based on the preceding ones. Some of these are:
For movement and learning to occur, our brains need to ‘put together’ all the preceding factors efficiently and eventually automatically. It seems that in some children, the process does not work entirely efficiently. If we take a complex process like writing and analyse it, we can see how many components are required. Some of these are: Posture Vestibular processing is needed for basic sitting stability and adjustment when required. Touch We need adequate tactile information in order to feel the pencil, know how tightly we are holding it or how hard we are pressing. Proprioception Required for efficient grasp and joint movement and detection of force required. Bilateral Integration We need to use two hands together efficiently, one to hold the pencil and the other to stabilise the page. Directionality Develops as part of the above and is required for direction of letters, letter formation, working from left to right of a page. Language Skills Essential for learning.In the child with DCD problems it seems that these early functions are not complete. There are many reasons for this, such as:
When this groundwork is not complete, movement continues to be conscious (or thought through) rather than automatic, and consequently the child is less able to cope with and think about the more sophisticated complex parts of tasks. It has been said that, “there is nothing less efficient than the cortex (or ‘thinking’ part of the brain) thinking its way through movement”. In many DCD children, this is precisely what appears to be happening, having a considerable effect on sophisticated skills and academic learning. Finally, no two children are exactly the same, and there are many different sorts of Motor and Specific Learning Difficulties. The child’s problems with perception and processing can lie in several different areas.
Frequently there is a combination of more than one of these possibilities. Sometimes, sadly, a child has generalised problems affecting all these areas and often (though not always) this may be associated with restlessness and poor attention. In these cases, the child who obviously has no compensating area of strength may gain less from treatment. Whatever the problem, the result is a child with co-ordination problems, specific learning difficulties and often speech and language problems; a child whose self-esteem is usually low, who lacks confidence and who is often a lonely child, may develop strong opting out strategies and other behavioural or emotional problems. In short, children with these difficulties need understanding and positive help if life is not to become frustrating and unhappy for family, teachers and, most of all, themselves. The Dyspraxic Child Praxis is the ability by which we figure out how to use our hands and body in skilled tasks such as playing with toys, using a pencil or fork, building a structure, straightening up a room or engaging in many occupations.
It is unique in human skills and is one of the most critical links between brain and behaviour. Praxis is to physical work what speech is to the social world. Dyspraxia is an impairment of the organisation of movement, i.e. ideation –motor planning – execution. A dyspraxic child has difficulty using his or her body, including relating to some objects in the environment. A dyspraxic child often has trouble with organising his/her own behaviour. Associated with this there are problems of language perception, thought and emotional behaviour. All these problems will manifest themselves in learning activities, e.g. writing, reading, spelling and activities of daily living e.g. dressing. Ref: Chu: OT and Sensory Integration- cited in “Dyspraxia Trust – Praxis makes Perfect.” Bibliography DSMIV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Fourth Edition. Motor Skill Disorders, 315.4 Developmental Co-Ordination Disorder, pages 56-58, ISBN 0-89042-025-4. ICD10. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1992, Vol. 1, Tenth Revision, Code F82, page 375, ISBN 92-4-154419.8. Ayres A J. Sensory Integration and the Child. Western Psychological Services, 1987, ISBN 0-87424-158-8. Ayres A J. Sensory Integration and Learning Disorder. Western Psychological Services, ISBN 0-87424-303-3. Fisher Murray, Bundy. Sensory Integration – Theory and Practice. F A Davies, ISBN 0-8036-3565-6. Kranowitz C S. The Out of Sync Child. The Berkley Publishing Group, 1998, New York, ISBN 0-399-52386-3. Stephenson E. The Child with Developmental Co-ordination Disorder. Waverley Press, 2000, Aberdeen. | Back | Table of Contents | Next | | Home | DCD Explained | Guidance Notes | Group Activities | Newsletters | Design & Development by Merkinch Technology Centre. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||